Highlights from this Publication

“ …We observed that 119 of 125 IBDoc readings ≥ 500 μg/g were concordant with fCAL results (95%), compared to 35% and 49% for the QuantOnCal—IDK-Calprotectin and CalproSmart—Calprotectin-ALP pairs.…”

“The CalproSmart and QuantOn Cal smartphone applications had significantly more reading errors than the IBDoc application, with rates of respectively 5.8% and 4.8% versus 1.9%(P = 0.002 and P = 0.012)…”

ECCO 2019 Poster

Haisma et al. Poster: P625. Head-to-head comparison of three stool calprotectin tests for home use. ECCO 2019: Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 14th Congress, March 6-9, 2019, Copenhagen/Denmark.